| Offence(s) Charged: | Count 01: Unlawful possession of controlled drug contrary to section 3 of the Misuse of Drugs Act. Count 02: Possession of a controlled drug for the purpose of selling or otherwise supplying it to another contrary to section 15 of the Misuse of Drugs Act. Count 03: Unlawful importation of a controlled drug contrary to section 21(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act. Count 04: Possession of a controlled drug for the purpose of selling or otherwise supplying it to another with a value in excess of €13,000 contrary to section 15A of the Misuse of Drugs Act, as amended.
|
| Offence(s) Taken into Consideration: |
|
| Ancillary/Consequential Orders Made: | Forfeiture and destruction of the drugs. Confiscation of $1,000 found on accused at time of arrest.
Certification that accused be placed on the Drugs Register under the Criminal Justice Act 2006.
|
| Date Of Offence: | 27/03/2006
|
| Comments on Offence dates: |
|
| Location Of Offence: | Dublin Airport.
|
| Brief Description Of Offence(s): | The accused was stopped by customs official in Dublin Airport. She consented to giving a urine sample which tested positive for cocaine. The accused was taken to hospital where she was discovered to be carrying 117 pellets of cocaine within her person. The amount of cocaine was in excess of 1 kilo and valued at €74,036. The accused had swallowed the cocaine over a period of 12 hours and was given $1,000 before she left the foreign jurisdiction.
|
| Sentencing Comments: | Accused is charged with very serious offence. The court accepts that the accused must have been under severe financial pressure to carry the drugs within her person and the danger of such a method. However, the accused was not a drug addict and carried the drugs for reward. The accused made an early plea, was genuinely remorseful and gave as much material assistance to the Gardaí as she could. Very positive testimonials had been handed into court. It was clear that the accused used her time in prison positively and to the assistance of other foreign prisoners. The court was conscious of the difficulties the accused faced as a foreign national serving a sentence without the support of her family. Because of all the matters outlined the court had discretion to deviate from the suggested minimum sentence.
|